DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Nissan X-Trail vs 2017 Jaguar F-Pace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJaguar
X-TrailModelF-Pace
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
177 HPPower163 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17; 225/55 R19Tyre size235/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4746 mm
1820 mmWidth2070 mm
1715 mmHeight1667 mm
1540-1600 KgWeight1690 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Nissan X-Trail and 2017 Jaguar F-Pace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…