2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score64.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Nissan X-Trail Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
X-Trail
Nissan X-Trail 2.0 dCi (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Trail
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan X-Trail
VolvoMakeNissan
S40ModelX-Trail
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan X-Trail
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
350 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan X-Trail
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan X-Trail
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationNissan X-Trail
4476 mmLength4635 mm
1770 mmWidth1790 mm
1454 mmHeight1700 mm
1498 KgWeight1605 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…