DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan X-Trail vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan X-TrailSpecificationMG ZS
NissanMakeMG
X-TrailModelZS
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan X-TrailSpecificationMG ZS
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
177 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
140 HPPower117 HP
192 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan X-TrailSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan X-TrailSpecificationMG ZS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/70 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan X-TrailSpecificationMG ZS
4455 mmLength4520 mm
1765 mmWidth1700 mm
1675 mmHeight1390 mm
1430 KgWeight1125 Kg
2625 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan X-Trail and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…