DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2004 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeNissan
RezzoModelX-Trail
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,4 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
104 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
128 HPPower140 HP
176 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
15,1 ltUrban consumption12,2 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4455 mm
1750 mmWidth1765 mm
1580 mmHeight1675 mm
1392 KgWeight1430 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Daewoo Rezzo and 2004 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…