DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan Titan vs 2014 RAM 2500/3500 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 2500/3500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRAM
TitanModel2500/3500
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5/6Seats5-6
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
390 HPPower383 HP
394 NmTorque542 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank117 lt
18,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
7Gears6
265/70 R18; 275/60 R20Tyre size245/70 R17 116S; 265/70 R17 118S; 275/70 R18 118T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5794-5804 mmLength6030 mm
2019-2050 mmWidth—
1930-1961 mmHeight1974 mm
2580-2691 KgWeight2853 Kg
3551 mmWheelbase3782 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan Titan and 2014 RAM 2500/3500 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 2500/3500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…