DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 RAM 1500 vs 2016 Nissan Titan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

RAM 1500

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RAMMakeNissan
1500ModelTitan
2014Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5-6Seats5/6
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
395 HPPower390 HP
548 NmTorque394 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption18,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption13,5 lt
—Average consumption15,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7
265/70 R17Tyre size265/70 R18; 275/60 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

6043 mmLength5794-5804 mm
—Width2019-2050 mm
1965 mmHeight1930-1961 mm
2459 KgWeight2580-2691 Kg
3795 mmWheelbase3551 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 RAM 1500 and 2016 Nissan Titan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, RAM 1500 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…