DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Nissan Terrano vs 1987 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

48.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
TerranoModelCedric
1987Model year1987
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
150 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
99 HPPower94 HP
216 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank72 lt
10 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size195/70 R14

Dimensions

4365 mmLength4690 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1680 mmHeight1425 mm
1670 KgWeight1410 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Nissan Terrano and 1987 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…