DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1987 Nissan Cedric vs 1987 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
CedricModelTerrano
1987Model year1987
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
167 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2825 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
94 HPPower99 HP
177 NmTorque216 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size215/75 R15

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4365 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1425 mmHeight1680 mm
1410 KgWeight1670 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1987 Nissan Cedric and 1987 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…