DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Terrano vs 1996 Ford Maverick Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Maverick

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
TerranoModelMaverick
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
155 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
125 HPPower124 HP
278 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15 STyre size215/80 R15 R
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4185 mmLength4105 mm
1755 mmWidth1735 mm
1830 mmHeight1805 mm
1745 KgWeight1620 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Terrano and 1996 Ford Maverick approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Maverick leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…