DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Holden Apollo vs 1996 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Apollo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeNissan
ApolloModelTerrano
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h15,7 s
190 km/hTop speed155 km/h
2164 ccEngine displacement2663 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
185 NmTorque278 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
10,9 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14 HTyre size235/75 R15 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4725 mmLength4185 mm
1770 mmWidth1755 mm
1400 mmHeight1830 mm
1350 KgWeight1745 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Holden Apollo and 1996 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Apollo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…