DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan Sentra vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Sentra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
SentraModelC-Max
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeMpv
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
124 HPPower125 HP
169 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
XtronicGears5
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4625 mmLength4379 mm
1760 mmWidth1858 mm
1496 mmHeight1610 mm
1304 KgWeight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
2700 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan Sentra and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Sentra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…