2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Trend 2016 1.6 125 HPOverall Score64.25/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Nissan Sentra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Nissan
Sentra
Nissan Sentra 1.8 (124 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Sentra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
64.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Sentra
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelSentra
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Sentra
11,8 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
125 HPPower124 HP
159 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Sentra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Sentra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5GearsXtronic
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Sentra
4379 mmLength4625 mm
1858 mmWidth1760 mm
1610 mmHeight1496 mm
1374 kgWeight1304 Kg
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2700 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Nissan Sentra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Sentra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…