2000 • Nissan
Quest
Nissan Quest 3.0 i (151 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Nissan Quest vs 2000 Mercury Sable Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan QuestSpecificationMercury Sable
NissanMakeMercury
QuestModelSable
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan QuestSpecificationMercury Sable
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2960 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
151 HPPower147 HP
235 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan QuestSpecificationMercury Sable
PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank61 lt
14 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan QuestSpecificationMercury Sable
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/70 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan QuestSpecificationMercury Sable
4823 mmLength5070 mm
1872 mmWidth1850 mm
1717 mmHeight1410 mm
1811 KgWeight1535 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Quest and 2000 Mercury Sable approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…