2000 • Mercury
Sable
Mercury Sable 3.0 V6 (147 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
2000 Mercury Sable vs 2000 Nissan Quest Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Quest
Nissan Quest 3.0 i (151 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mercury Sable
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury SableSpecificationNissan Quest
MercuryMakeNissan
SableModelQuest
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4
Performance
Mercury SableSpecificationNissan Quest
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
147 HPPower151 HP
230 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury SableSpecificationNissan Quest
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury SableSpecificationNissan Quest
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mercury SableSpecificationNissan Quest
5070 mmLength4823 mm
1850 mmWidth1872 mm
1410 mmHeight1717 mm
1535 KgWeight1811 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mercury Sable and 2000 Nissan Quest approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…