DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Aerostar vs 1995 Nissan Quest Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Aerostar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
AerostarModelQuest
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2960 cc
147 HPPower151 HP
224 NmTorque235 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank76 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/75 R14Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength4823 mm
1820 mmWidth1872 mm
1850 mmHeight1717 mm
1530 KgWeight1811 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Aerostar and 1995 Nissan Quest approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Aerostar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…