2000 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar 1.6 i (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Nissan Pulsar vs 2000 Hyundai Lantra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Hyundai
Lantra
Hyundai Lantra 1.8 16V (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Hyundai Lantra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan PulsarSpecificationHyundai Lantra
NissanMakeHyundai
PulsarModelLantra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan PulsarSpecificationHyundai Lantra
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
140 HPPower128 HP
0 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan PulsarSpecificationHyundai Lantra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan PulsarSpecificationHyundai Lantra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/60 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan PulsarSpecificationHyundai Lantra
—Length4420 mm
—Width1700 mm
—Height1393 mm
—Weight1247 Kg
—Wheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Pulsar and 2000 Hyundai Lantra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…