2000 • Hyundai
Lantra
Hyundai Lantra 1.8 16V (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Hyundai Lantra vs 2000 Nissan Pulsar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar 1.6 i (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Hyundai Lantra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hyundai LantraSpecificationNissan Pulsar
HyundaiMakeNissan
LantraModelPulsar
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Hyundai LantraSpecificationNissan Pulsar
9,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
128 HPPower140 HP
162 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Hyundai LantraSpecificationNissan Pulsar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Hyundai LantraSpecificationNissan Pulsar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/60 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Hyundai LantraSpecificationNissan Pulsar
4420 mmLength—
1700 mmWidth—
1393 mmHeight—
1247 KgWeight—
2550 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Hyundai Lantra and 2000 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…