2000 • Nissan
Pulsar
Nissan Pulsar 1.6 i (140 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Nissan Pulsar vs 2000 Fiat Marea Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Fiat
Marea
Fiat Marea 1.8 i 16V (132 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Marea
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan PulsarSpecificationFiat Marea
NissanMakeFiat
PulsarModelMarea
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan PulsarSpecificationFiat Marea
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1747 cc
140 HPPower132 HP
0 NmTorque164 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan PulsarSpecificationFiat Marea
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan PulsarSpecificationFiat Marea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan PulsarSpecificationFiat Marea
—Length4393 mm
—Width1740 mm
—Height1420 mm
—Weight1195 Kg
—Wheelbase2540 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Pulsar and 2000 Fiat Marea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Marea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…