DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Thunderbird vs 2005 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ThunderbirdModelPathfinder
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats7
2Doors4

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
220 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3954 cc
283 HPPower269 HP
388 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption18,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption13,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size255/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4877 mm
1829 mmWidth1854 mm
1323 mmHeight1879 mm
1748 KgWeight2132 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Thunderbird and 2005 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…