DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Nissan Pathfinder vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
PathfinderModelCX-5
2013Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
186 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
190 HPPower192 HP
450 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,0 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
255/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength4555 mm
1848 mmWidth1840 mm
1858 mmHeight1710 mm
2110 KgWeight1440 Kg
2853 mmWheelbase2070 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Nissan Pathfinder and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…