DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
CX-5ModelPathfinder
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
192 km/hTop speed186 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
192 HPPower190 HP
256 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size255/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4555 mmLength4813 mm
1840 mmWidth1848 mm
1710 mmHeight1858 mm
1440 KgWeight2110 Kg
2070 mmWheelbase2853 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-5 and 2013 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…