DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Navara vs 2004 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Cherokee

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
NavaraModelCherokee
2004Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,8 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2778 cc
148 HPPower163 HP
314 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank76 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4430 mm
1850 mmWidth1820 mm
1774 mmHeight1865 mm
—Weight1960 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Navara and 2004 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…