2004 • Jeep
Cherokee
Jeep Cherokee 2.8 CRDi (163 Hp) 2004Overall Score65.5/100
2004 Jeep Cherokee vs 2004 Nissan Navara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 3.0 Td Double Cab 4WD (148 Hp) 2004Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Cherokee
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationNissan Navara
JeepMakeNissan
CherokeeModelNavara
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationNissan Navara
12,8 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2778 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
163 HPPower148 HP
400 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationNissan Navara
DieselFuel typeDiesel
76 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jeep CherokeeSpecificationNissan Navara
4430 mmLength5220 mm
1820 mmWidth1850 mm
1865 mmHeight1774 mm
1960 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Jeep Cherokee and 2004 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Cherokee leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…