DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Nissan Navara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeNissan
CompassModelNavara
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
4Doors4

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
201 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower190 HP
320 NmTorque403 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size235/70 R16; 255/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength5222 mm
1812 mmWidth1848 mm
1718 mmHeight1773 mm
1680 KgWeight1815 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…