DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Navara vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeJeep
NavaraModelCompass
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
172 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
190 HPPower163 HP
403 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank51 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4448 mm
1848 mmWidth1812 mm
1773 mmHeight1718 mm
1815 KgWeight1680 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Navara and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…