DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Subaru Outback vs 2000 Nissan Navara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Outback

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeNissan
OutbackModelNavara
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
197 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
156 HPPower148 HP
223 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength5220 mm
1770 mmWidth1850 mm
1545 mmHeight1774 mm
1480 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase3200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Subaru Outback and 2000 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Outback leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…