DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Murano vs 2004 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
MuranoModelPathfinder
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3498 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
248 HPPower220 HP
333 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption18,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
—Average consumption14,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears4
235/65 R18Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4640 mm
1880 mmWidth1820 mm
1690 mmHeight1750 mm
1588 KgWeight1950 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Murano and 2004 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…