DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeNissan
CompassModelMurano
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,90 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
201 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower190 HP
320 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank82 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size235/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4448 mmLength4860 mm
1812 mmWidth1885 mm
1718 mmHeight1720 mm
1680 KgWeight1875 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…