DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan Murano vs 2011 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
MuranoModelV50
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
190 HPPower230 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4522 mm
1885 mmWidth1845 mm
1720 mmHeight1457 mm
1875 KgWeight1504 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan Murano and 2011 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…