DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo S40 vs 2011 Nissan Murano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Murano

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
S40ModelMurano
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
230 HPPower190 HP
320 NmTorque450 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank82 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4476 mmLength4860 mm
1770 mmWidth1885 mm
1454 mmHeight1720 mm
1478 KgWeight1875 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo S40 and 2011 Nissan Murano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…