DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Micra vs 2005 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Micra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
MicraModelC-Max
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1460 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
82 HPPower90 HP
185 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3715 mmLength4333 mm
1660 mmWidth1825 mm
1525 mmHeight—
1025 KgWeight—
2430 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Micra and 2005 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…