2005 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (90 Hp) 2005Overall Score61.5/100
2005 Ford C-Max vs 2005 Nissan Micra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Nissan
Micra
Nissan Micra 1.5 Di (82 Hp) 2005Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Micra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Micra
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelMicra
2005Model year2005
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Micra
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1460 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
215 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Micra
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Micra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan Micra
4333 mmLength3715 mm
1825 mmWidth1660 mm
—Height1525 mm
—Weight1025 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Ford C-Max and 2005 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Micra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…