DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Nissan Micra vs 2016 Honda Brio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Brio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.25–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHonda
MicraModelBrio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,7 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1198 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
80 HPPower88 HP
110 NmTorque109 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
CVTTransmission—
14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3825 mmLength3610 mm
1665 mmWidth1680 mm
1510 mmHeight1500 mm
945 kgWeight920 Kg
265 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2345 mm

Additional Features

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth
Honda Brio

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Nissan Micra and 2016 Honda Brio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Brio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…