DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Mirage vs 2016 Nissan Micra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Mirage

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
MirageModelMicra
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1193 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
74 HPPower80 HP
100 NmTorque110 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank41 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
165/65 R14Tyre size14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3780 mmLength3825 mm
1666 mmWidth1665 mm
1501 mmHeight1510 mm
895-905 KgWeight945 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2450 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Nissan MicraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPHill Start AssistCruise ControlComing HomeLeaving HomeTrip ComputerArmrestPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Mirage and 2016 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Mirage leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…