DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan March vs 2002 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan March

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
MarchModelFusion
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
170 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1348 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
82 HPPower68 HP
108 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3746 mmLength4020 mm
1595 mmWidth1708 mm
1440 mmHeight1503 mm
865 KgWeight1105 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2488 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan March and 2002 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan March leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…