DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Fusion vs 2002 Nissan March Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan March

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FusionModelMarch
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
158 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1399 ccEngine displacement1348 cc
68 HPPower82 HP
160 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size165/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4020 mmLength3746 mm
1708 mmWidth1595 mm
1503 mmHeight1440 mm
1105 KgWeight865 Kg
2488 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Fusion and 2002 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan March leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…