DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan March vs 2009 Perodua Kenari Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kenari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakePerodua
MarchModelKenari
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
154 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1240 ccEngine displacement989 cc
65 HPPower56 HP
110 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3715 mmLength3460 mm
1660 mmWidth1475 mm
1525 mmHeight1665 mm
980 KgWeight845 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan March and 2009 Perodua Kenari approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kenari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…