DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Chery Sweet (QQ) vs 2009 Nissan March Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chery Sweet (QQ)

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CheryMakeNissan
Sweet (QQ)ModelMarch
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
140 km/hTop speed154 km/h
1051 ccEngine displacement1240 cc
53 HPPower65 HP
83 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/65 R13; 175/60 R13Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3550 mmLength3715 mm
1508 mmWidth1660 mm
1491 mmHeight1525 mm
850 KgWeight980 Kg
—Wheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Chery Sweet (QQ) and 2009 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chery Sweet (QQ) leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…