DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan Laurel vs 2003 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Laurel

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCadillac
LaurelModelCTS
2002Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
210 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
200 HPPower215 HP
255 NmTorque262 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank66 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4765 mmLength4828 mm
1730 mmWidth1795 mm
1400 mmHeight1441 mm
1520 KgWeight1705 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan Laurel and 2003 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Laurel leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…