DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Largo vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan LargoSpecificationGAZ 31
NissanMakeGAZ
LargoModel31
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan LargoSpecificationGAZ 31
—0–100 km/h13,5 s
0 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2388 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
192 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan LargoSpecificationGAZ 31
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,67 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan LargoSpecificationGAZ 31
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Nissan LargoSpecificationGAZ 31
4610 mmLength4870 mm
1745 mmWidth1800 mm
1905 mmHeight1422 mm
1620 KgWeight1400 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Largo and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…