2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T (190 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
2017 Nissan Juke vs 2017 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.7 CRDi (141 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationKia Optima
NissanMakeKia
JukeModelOptima
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationKia Optima
7,8 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
215 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1618 ccEngine displacement1685 cc
190 HPPower141 HP
240 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationKia Optima
4135 mmLength4855 mm
1765 mmWidth1860 mm
1565 mmHeight1465 mm
1225-1284 KgWeight1515 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2805 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan Juke and 2017 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…