2017 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.7 CRDi (141 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Nissan Juke Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T (190 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Juke
KiaMakeNissan
OptimaModelJuke
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Juke
10,0 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
203 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
141 HPPower190 HP
340 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Juke
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Juke
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Juke
4855 mmLength4135 mm
1860 mmWidth1765 mm
1465 mmHeight1565 mm
1515 KgWeight1225-1284 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2530 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…