DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan Juke vs 2014 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Juke

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
JukeModelJuke
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
215 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1618 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
240 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4165 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1565 mmHeight1565 mm
1225-1284 KgWeight1293 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan Juke and 2014 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…