DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Nissan Juke vs 2015 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Juke

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeNissan
JukeModelJuke
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
200 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1618 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4165 mmLength4135 mm
1770 mmWidth1765 mm
1565 mmHeight1565 mm
1293 KgWeight1225-1284 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Nissan Juke and 2015 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…