2012 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.6 DIG-T (190 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Nissan Juke vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolvo S40
NissanMakeVolvo
JukeModelS40
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolvo S40
8,0 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1618 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationVolvo S40
4135 mmLength4476 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1570 mmHeight1454 mm
1286 KgWeight1498 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Juke and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…