DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Nissan Juke Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Juke

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeNissan
C30ModelJuke
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

8,6 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
177 HPPower190 HP
400 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4266 mmLength4135 mm
1782 mmWidth1765 mm
1447 mmHeight1570 mm
1451 KgWeight1286 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…