2012 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.6 16V (117 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
2012 Nissan Juke vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan JukeSpecificationFiat Bravo
NissanMakeFiat
JukeModelBravo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan JukeSpecificationFiat Bravo
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
178 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
117 HPPower90 HP
158 NmTorque290 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan JukeSpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan JukeSpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan JukeSpecificationFiat Bravo
4135 mmLength4336 mm
1765 mmWidth1792 mm
1570 mmHeight1498 mm
1172 KgWeight1320 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Juke and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…