2012 • Fiat
Bravo
Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet (90 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.25/100
2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Nissan Juke Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Juke
Nissan Juke 1.6 16V (117 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Juke
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Juke
FiatMakeNissan
BravoModelJuke
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Juke
12,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
173 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
90 HPPower117 HP
290 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Juke
DieselFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank46 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Juke
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat BravoSpecificationNissan Juke
4336 mmLength4135 mm
1792 mmWidth1765 mm
1498 mmHeight1570 mm
1320 KgWeight1172 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2530 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Nissan Juke approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Juke leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…