DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A7 vs 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 4C

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

89.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeAlfa Romeo
A7Model4C
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed258 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1742 cc
252 HPPower240 HP
370 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 S-tronicGears6
—TransmissionTCT
235/55 R17Tyre size18
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4974 mmLength3989 mm
1911 mmWidth1864 mm
1420 mmHeight1183 mm
1730 KgWeight895 kg
—Luggage capacity110 lt
2914 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A7 and 2016 Alfa Romeo 4C approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 4C leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…