DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Alfa Romeo 4C vs 2016 Audi A7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 4C

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–89.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeAudi
4CModelA7
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

4,5 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
258 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1742 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
240 HPPower252 HP
350 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank65 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 S-tronic
TCTTransmission—
18Tyre size235/55 R17
NoABSYes

Dimensions

3989 mmLength4974 mm
1864 mmWidth1911 mm
1183 mmHeight1420 mm
895 kgWeight1730 Kg
110 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2914 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Alfa Romeo 4C and 2016 Audi A7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 4C leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…